🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.